Clute Institute for Academic Research Clute Institute graphic banner
Clute Institute for Academic ResearchClute Institute for Academic ResearchContacting Clute Institute for Academic ResearchClute Institute for Academic Research photographs
 Published Journals:
Journal of Applied Business Research
Journal of College Teaching & Learning
Journal of Business Case Studies
Journal of Business & Economics Research
College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal
International Business & Economics Research Journal
Review of Business Information Systems
Journal of Diversity Management
American Journal of Business Education
Contemporary Issues in Education Research
Journal of Service Science
 Key Word Search:
 Search Authors:
 
{ Advanced Search }
 
PDF Instructions
Go Back
 
  Journal of College Teaching & Learning
  Year: 2008 | Month: October | Volume: 5 | Number: 10  
Learning Styles And The Online Classroom: Implications For Business Students
Michael Nastanski, Saint Leo University, USA
Thomas Slick, La Verne University, USA
Abstract
This paper discusses the importance of student learning styles within a Distance Learning (DL) classroom. The study examines the learning style preferences of online business students as measured by the Kolb Learning Style Inventory and determines if a significant difference in course grades and course completion rates exist between students when they are sorted by learning style preference. Subjects in the study were 344 online business students from a southeastern university in the United States. Examination of the quantitative data indicated a significant difference existed for Diverger Style Preference learners compared to the Assimilator, Accommodator and Converger learning styles. They had a lower Mean Grade Point (GP) earned. The study revealed approximately one out of five (20%) of the respondents had a Diverger Learning Style Preference. Respondents with this learning style preference appear to be somewhat less likely to be successful in a distance learning environment. A Chi Square calculation showed no significant difference existed among learning styles for those dropping a course although one group (Accomodators) had approximately twice the drop rate of the others. This paper and corresponding study offers university administrators who seek to maintain quality instruction evidence and suggestions for addressing 20 percent of their online population who may be at risk of not obtaining content mastery. This includes implications for DL course design and pedagogy.
 
View PDF
 
Go Back
 

To receive Call for Papers for conferences and/or journals, please go to "Contact Us" and click on our email address to send us a message.

 
(Clute Institute for Academic Research article #: 1422)

| HOME | Journals | Contact Us |
| Clute Institute for Academic Research. com |

© 2010 The Clute Institute for Academic Research - PO Box 620760, Littleton Colorado 80162 USA
- 391,876 -